- my iParenting

- quick clicks
- babies today articles
- babies today q&a
- toddlers today articles
- toddlers today q&a
- breastfeed.com articles
- breastfeed.com q&a
- community & groups
- research baby names
- prepare a birth plan
- content channels
- ip channel rss feeds
- read birth stories
- read parenting stories
- recommended books
- e-newsletters
- safety recalls
- ip diaries
- ip store
- mom of the month
- dad of the month
- editor's letter
- letters to the editor
From Our Sponsors
- e-newsletters
- Sign up to receive our free weekly e-newsletters
- award-winning products
The iParenting Media Awards program helps parents find the best products for their families.
The Use of Nanny Cams
![]()
The frenzy to spy on caregivers has heated up since coming into view of the
public eye. Gil Neuman, CEO of Kent Security Systems, says people should be
most concerned about the process they use to hire a caregiver -- or lack of
process. "As people
would see those stories on the nightly news, they became more and
more worried," he says. "They began to realize that they think they know
their help,
but they're really not sure. Our company asks people to give us the first
name, last name and address of the cleaning people, nannies or babysitters
they employ. Regretfully, most do not know."
Resources such as credit agencies, police departments and court records are
available for little or no charge when used for verifying employment. Carl
Stell, a father and small business owner from Petersburg, Va., says, "I
have used the same methods of verifying daycare providers and babysitters as
I do when I
hire someone to work with me in my repair business. It only takes a phone
call and maybe a few bucks, but I would rather know before something happens
than wish I would have checked afterward."
Even after verifying someone's background, many parents still want to know
what the babysitter is doing when parents are away. Electronic recording
devices can be as small as a tie clip or as large as a
VCR. Regardless of the size of the device, no one will ever know they are
there. "With current technology, we can put cameras into
anything," Neuman says. "You'll never know it's a camera. We have put
cameras inside
grandfather clocks, mirrors, alarm clocks, stereo systems and VCRs. These
objects still function normally so no suspicion that a camera is in the
device is ever drawn. The mechanism of a camera today is smaller than your
thumb. The size of the lens is about the size of a pin. You can look at it
straight and never know what it is."
According to Neuman, the issue of control is one reason for the installation
of so-called nanny cams. Parents may feel they are not in control of what
happens to
their children once they leave their side and want to rectify this by
whatever means necessary. The use of nanny cams is one way to do this.
"I think that people want to feel that they control their own house or their
own destiny," Neuman says. "They want to know that nothing is happening that
they do not approve of while they are away. When you leave your kids or your
property with someone else or in someone else's care, you lose control. But
by keeping certain electronic devices to monitor your home or children, you
can stay in control."
Companies such as Kent Security Systems address issues of morality and
legality. According to Neuman, neither issue holds a candle to risking a
child's safety. "Obviously when we talk about morality it all goes down the
drain when you see a stranger hit or physically abuse a child," Neuman says.
"The whole point of morality is good in public, but it doesn't really stand
in private. We also have a moral obligation to stop bad people from doing
bad things, for us and other people. If we have a bad apple who is working
for us and working for somebody else, we have to get him or her out of the
job. Just as you would get a drunken driver off the road, the bad apples of
babysitting should be taken out of the homes. Any of these tapes used would
stand up in court. It's legal to video record anybody anywhere -- with the
exception of bathrooms or changing rooms -- without their knowledge."
According to Neuman, if a parent informs the caregiver that her actions are
being recorded and will be viewed later, the caregiver will alter her
behavior, allowing the parent to believe he has made a sound hiring
decision. "Telling a babysitter you are recording their actions and
behaviors
is like telling the answers to the test before you give the exam," Neuman
says. "We want to see what they really act like in real time, not when we
tell them they are auditioning. Parents who have these nanny cams should not
tell those who
they employ about them. It will alter their behavior and give the parent --
and the children -- a false sense of security."
The use of electronic recording devices has offered parents the peace of
mind to know their children are safe. The decision to use them is a very
personal one, but Neuman suggests that they are worth the security they
provide. "The bottom line is you want to protect the things that are
important to you," he says. "And if it's in your home or in your work place,
you have the right to do it."
Disturbing videos of caregivers abusing children have been displayed on various
programs such as "60 Minutes," "Dateline" and evening news programs across the country. As a result, the use of "nanny cams" has become as
standard as electric garage door openers, according to Kent Securities in
North Miami Beach, Fla. Parents want to feel they are protecting their
children, their homes and their lives at all times, and the use of
electronic
monitoring devices such as nanny cams offers that extra peace of mind.
Not all parents agree with the use of electronic video equipment to
monitor caregivers. Some believe there is a moral or ethical
issue, or even that the use of nanny cams is an invasion of privacy. Lori
McKenzie, a mother and freelance writer from Minneapolis, Minn., says, "If
I had good enough reasons to feel a closed circuit camera was necessary then
I feel I have enough reason to remove my children from that person's care. I
would never seriously consider the use of a camera in order to catch them in
the act. I think it would be an invasion of privacy and it is immoral to
trick someone so you can catch him or her committing a crime. If I were
going
to use one, I would tell the babysitter it was there -- I think it's illegal
to record someone without their permission anyway."
|
Want to see more? |
![]()
![]()



